Women’s leadership roles increasing in Telehealth & Health Care, but the journey toward equity is far from over

Charlotte Yeh

When Charlotte Yeh entered medical school decades ago, it was the first year more than 10 percent of the slots were available to women. Fast forward to today, and women make up almost half of medical school classes. Women also hold prominent roles throughout health care, including in management. But getting a coveted spot in the C-suite has been tougher, says Yeh, now the chief medical officer for AARP Services.

“Women are not very well represented in the highest levels of leadership,” she says. “The current generation may feel kind of complacent… but they haven’t realized there’s still the hurdle of getting into the top management.”

That broader picture is similar in the field of telehealth, where women leaders say they’re still underrepresented. So how can women strengthen their roles in telehealth as the industry continues its explosive growth? In a first-ever event, the American Telemedicine Association conference in Orlando this month will feature the panel, “Women Executives in Telehealth: Positioning for the Future.”

“I’m very impressed with the ATA,” says Yeh, who will moderate the panel. “It’s remarkable and a positive sign of the times that they’re already talking about leadership.”

In the best, most high-performing organizations in any field, Yeh says, it’s common to see more women included among the board and management. “Let’s face it, men and women are different,” she says. “Women may lend a very different lens or perspective versus if everyone at the table looks the same.”

Mon PM, Kristi Henderson

Kristi Henderson

That’s especially true in health care, as women often make decisions related to their family’s health, says panelist Kristi Henderson, vice president for virtual care and innovation at Seton Healthcare Family. “Without their voice,” she says, “solutions will not appreciate the perspective of women who are the users or facilitators of these services the majority of the time.”

Mon PM, Julie Hall-Barrow

Julie Hall-Barrow

In telehealth specifically, it’s imperative for women to play a role in the direction and innovation of new technologies and how organizations and companies are structuring their strategy, says panelist Julie Hall-Barrow, vice president for virtual health and innovation at Children’s Health, Dallas. “Without the perspective and tenacity of women in key leadership roles,” she says, “the industry as a whole will lack vision.”

Progress made, but more needed

The enormous growth of the health care industry in the last two decades has included increased options for women, says Henderson, who began exploring telehealth 18 years ago and went live with her first telehealth program in 2003. “The number and variety of jobs in telehealth have created new opportunities for women across business, clinical and technology sectors,” she says. “The value of women in health IT leadership roles is evident, resulting in increased numbers of women holding senior leadership roles in telehealth, health systems and health IT in general.”

Hall-Barrow, whose work in telehealth was spurred in the early 1990s, says she’s witnessed a growth of women leaders in the market. “My career has followed this trend,” she says, “and has led to incredible opportunities to lead efforts in one of the largest states in the nation and in one of the leading pediatric health care systems in North Texas.”

Mon PM, Paula Guy

Paula Guy

But while companies are putting policies in place to achieve equality for women in the workplace, more work is needed to create neutral gender environments, says panelist Paula Guy, president and chief executive of Salus Health.

There remains an underrepresentation of women at the board table, Henderson says. “There has been a slow increase of these women moving into more senior positions and being invited to the table for decisions,” she says. “Now that there is more of a conscious attention to diversity and inclusivity, this underrepresentation is changing.”

There’s still room for women leaders in telehealth, particularly in the C-suite and boardroom, says Hall-Barrow, and current leaders should encourage this by mentoring other women.

Advice from top women in telehealth

Honing an expertise to differentiate yourself from the pack is one way to achieve success in telehealth, Henderson says. “Find your skill and passion, then refine and perfect that skill,” she says. “Determination, integrity and tenacity are critical factors for career advancement.”

Start with a win, Hall-Barrow says. “When putting a program together, creating a technology, or implementing a system, do so with a guaranteed success,” she says. “This success will drive leaders to pay attention to your work and seek your advice for the next opportunity.”

Find a mentor, especially one in the field, Hall-Barrow says. “The more you can learn about the industry,” she says, “the faster you will make an impact in areas that you aren’t expected to make.”

And keep up with the rapidly changing health care market. “The more you know, the more key you will be in your industry,” she says.

Women have a long way to go to be close to where men are in leadership positions in health care, including telemedicine, Guy says. “The women I know in telemedicine are smart, strong, passionate, caring, and they work hard to get the job done,” she says. “If given the opportunity for leadership positions, we would see telemedicine grow like never before.”

Reducing cardiovascular disease risk with omega-3s

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one killer of Americans, and by 2030, nearly 44 percent of U.S. adults will have some form of the disease. [1] It has long been recognized that consumption of omega-3 fatty acids, especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), can help reduce the risk of CVD. [2,3]  Indeed, joint recommendations from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA), [4] and the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans [5] advise dietary patterns that include fish and/or an increased intake of EPA and DHA.

Reducing CVD Risk: Recent Findings

Numerous clinical studies and meta-analyses link intake of omega-3 fatty acids with reduced risks for CVD-related events and death. [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]  The most comprehensive assessment of the relationship of EPA and DHA (since both are typically found in fish, fish oil, and algal oil supplements) and coronary heart disease (CHD) was recently reported in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings . [14]  Drawing from more than 3,800 studies published from 1947 to 2015, the researchers identified 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 16 prospective cohort studies (PCSs) that reported CHD outcomes (e.g., myocardial infarction, angina, sudden cardiac death and coronary death) and met other criteria. The two groups of studies included approximately 93,000 and 732,000 participants, respectively.

Using meta-analysis models, the investigators calculated summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for CHD outcomes. For the RCT analysis, they compared the risk of CHD events for intervention-group participants consuming EPA and DHA, primarily from supplements (a few RCTs used fatty fish), compared to control-group participants who did not; for the PCS analysis, they compared the risk of CHD events associated with high vs. low intakes of EPA and DHA from all sources, including diet and supplementation. The analysis showed EPA and DHA reduced the risk for CHD events, especially in people with high serum triglycerides or LDL cholesterol (see Figure).

“The 6 percent reduced risk among RCTs, coupled with an 18 percent risk reduction in prospective cohort studies — which tend to include more real-life dietary scenarios over longer periods — tell a compelling story about the importance of EPA and DHA omega-3s for cardiovascular health,” said lead author Dominik Alexander, PhD, MSPH, Principal Epidemiologist for EpidStat, Ann Arbor, MI. [15] An accompanying editorial in Mayo Clinic Proceedings also acknowledged the importance of the findings. [16]

Scaling Up Fish Intake

On average, Americans 19 years and older consume an average of only 23 mg EPA and 63 mg DHA per day, [17]  far below the 250 mg omega-3s per day recommended in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. [18] Moreover, about 95.7 percent of Americans have plasma omega-3s below the concentration associated with cardiovascular protection. [19] Knowing the high prevalence of this nutrient gap should encourage practitioners to advise their patients on ways to increase omega-3 intake to recommended levels.

Dietary recommendations for omega-3 intake differ among local and regional authoritative bodies. In the US, the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans advises consuming about 8 ounces per week of a variety of seafood to obtain an average of approximately 250 mg per day of EPA and DHA, an amount associated with reduced cardiac deaths in people with and without preexisting CVD. [20]  The joint AHA/ACC guideline for secondary prevention recommends 1 g a day of omega-3 fatty acids from fish or fish oil capsules for CVD prevention and risk reduction in patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease. [21]  For patients who need to lower triglyceride levels, the AHA recommends 2 to 4 g of EPA and DHA per day. [22]  Based on these recommendations, physicians should advise patients to achieve the intake of omega-3s appropriate for their health needs through simple measures, such as incorporating fish rich in omega-3s as part of a heart-healthy diet and/or taking a dietary supplement that provides adequate amounts of EPA and DHA.

To learn more about omega-3s and Know Your Ω™, an educational campaign by DSM Nutritional Products, visit www.KnowYourO.com or visit booth #1717 at the ACP Internal Medicine Meeting in San Diego, CA March 30 – April 1. The Know Your Ω™ website has helpful tools for both physicians and patients, sharing more information on how to best recommend omega-3 EPA and DHA and incorporate them into a balanced lifestyle.

                                                                                                                                                      

References

[1]Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016 Jan 26; 133(4):e38-e360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366.

[2]Mozaffarian D, Lemaitre Rn, King IB et al. Plasma phospholipid long-chain ?-3 fatty acids and total and cause-specific mortality in   older adults: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:515-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00003.

[3]Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B et al. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the  Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000;102:2284–99. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.18.2284.

[4]Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S76-99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1.

[5]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 – 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. December 2015. Available at: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/chapter-2/a-closer-look-at-current-intakes-and-recommended-shifts/.

[6]Delgado-Lista J, Perez-Martinez P, Lopez-Miranda J, Perez-Jimenez F. Long chain omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(Suppl 2):S201-S213. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512001596.

[7]Kotwal S, Jun M, Sullivan D, Perkovic V, Neal B. Omega 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(6):808-818. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966168.

[8]Kwak SM, Myung SK, Lee YJ, Seo HG; Korean Meta-analysis Study Group. Ef?cacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplements  eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(9):686-694. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.262.

[9]Rizos EC, Ntzani EE, Bika E, Kostapanos MS, Elisaf MS. Association between omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and risk of major cardiovascular disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308(10):1024-1033. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11374.

[10]Chen Q, Cheng LQ, Xiao TH, et al. Effects of omega-3 fatty acid for sudden cardiac death prevention in patients with cardiovascular disease: a contemporary meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2011; 25(3):259-265. doi: 10.1007/s10557-011-6306-8.

[11]Wen YT, Dai JH, Gao Q. Effects of Omega-3 fatty acid on major cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;24(5):470-475. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.12.004.

[12]Casula M, Soranna D, Catapano AL, Corrao G. Long-term effect of high dose omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo controlled trials [corrected]. Atheroscler Suppl. 2013;14(2):243-251. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5688(13)70005-9.

[13]Wang C, Harris WS, Chung M, et al. n-3 Fatty acids from fish or fish-oil supplements, but not alpha-linolenic acid, benefit  cardiovascular disease outcomes in primary- and secondary prevention studies: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84(1):5-17. Available at: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/84/1/5.long.

[14]Alexander DD, Miller PE, Van Elswyk ME, Kuratko CN, Bylsma LC. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Cohort Studies of Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Long-Chain Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Coronary Heart Disease Risk. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.018. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.018.

[15]Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3 (GOED). Press Release. New Study Finds EPA and DHA Omega-3s Lower Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. January 3, 2017. Available at: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-study-finds-epa-and-dha-omega-3s-lower-risk-of-coronary-heart-disease-300384474.html.  

[16]O’Keefe JH, Jacob D, Lavie CJ. Omega-3 Fatty Acid Therapy: The Tide Turns for a Fish Story. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.11.008.

[17]Papanikolaou Y, Brooks J, Reider C, Fulgoni VL. U.S adults are not meeting recommended levels for fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake: results of an analysis using observational data from NHANES 2003-2008. Nutrition Journal. 2014;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-31. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-31.

[18]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 – 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. December 2015. Available at: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/chapter-2/a-closer-look-at-current-intakes-and-recommended-shifts/.

[19]Murphy RA, Yu EA, Ciappio ED, Mehta S, McBurney MI. Suboptimal Plasma Long Chain n-3 Concentrations are Common among Adults in the United States, NHANES 2003–2004. Nutrients. 2015;7:10282-9. doi: 10.3390/nu7125534.

[20]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 – 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. December 2015. Available at: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/chapter-2/a-closer-look-at-current-intakes-and-recommended-shifts/.

[21]Smith SC Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO et al. AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients With Coronary and Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2011;124:2458-73. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d.

[22]Kris-Etherton PM, Harris WS, Appel LJ. Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2002;106:2747-57. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000038493.65177.94.